Uncertain Reasoning Using Maximum Entropy Inference
نویسنده
چکیده
The use of maximum entropy infer ence in reasoning with uncertain informa tion is commonly justified by an information-theoretic argument. This paper discusses a possible objection to this information-theoretic justification and shows how it can be met. I then compare max imum entropy inference with certain other currently popular methods for uncertain rea soning. In making such a comparison, one must distinguish between static and dynamic theories of degrees of belief: a static theory concerns the consistency conditions for degrees of belief at a given time; whereas a dynamic theory concerns how one's degrees of belief should change in. the light of new information. lt is argued that maximum entropy is a dynamic theory and that a com plete theory of uncertain reasoning can be gotten by combining maximum entropy inference with probability theory, which is a static theory. This total theory, I argue, is much bet�r grounded than are other theories of uncertain reasoning.
منابع مشابه
Intelligent Agents for Multi-Issue Auctions and Bidding
An approach to auctions and bidding is founded on observations and expectations of the opponents' behavior and not on assumptions concerning the opponents' motivations or internal reasoning. The approach draws ideas from information theory. A bidding agent employs maximum entropy inference to determine its actions on the basis of this uncertain data. Maximum entropy inference may be applied bot...
متن کاملThe irrelevant information principle for collective probabilistic reasoning
Within the framework of discrete probabilistic uncertain reasoning a large literature exists justifying the maximum entropy inference process, ME, as being optimal in the context of a single agent whose subjective probabilistic knowledge base is consistent. In particular Paris and Vencovská completely characterised the ME inference process by means of an attractive set of axioms which an infere...
متن کاملUniversität Dortmund an der Fakultät für Informatik Matthias Thimm
Reasoning with inaccurate information is a major topic within the fields of artificial intelligence in general and knowledge representation and reasoning in particular. This thesis deals with information that can be incomplete, uncertain, and contradictory. We employ probabilistic conditional logic as a foundation for our investigation. This framework allows for the representation of uncertain ...
متن کاملProbabilistic Logics in Expert Systems: Approaches, Implementations, and Applications
The handling of uncertain information is of crucial importance for the success of expert systems. This paper gives an overview on logic-based approaches to probabilistic reasoning and goes into more details about recent developments for relational, respectively first-order, probabilistic methods like Markov logic networks, and Bayesian logic programs. In particular, we will feature the maximum ...
متن کاملA Foundational Approach to Generalising the Maximum Entropy Inference Process to the Multi-Agent Context
The present paper seeks to establish a logical foundation for studying axiomatically multi-agent probabilistic reasoning over a discrete space of outcomes. We study the notion of a social inference process which generalises the concept of an inference process for a single agent which was used by Paris and Vencovská to characterise axiomatically the method of maximum entropy inference. Axioms fo...
متن کامل